Where is mazoon moula

You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Thank you for your interest. You may also subscribe to our WhatsApp messaging service immediately.

Home Watch Learn Contribute. God has made the permissible, halal, permissible and helps in its acquisition, and He has made the forbidden, haram, forbidden and dispensable — Imam Moiz AS. About Mazoon-e-Dawat Dr. Private Nass is valid according to Dawat doctrine 2. Nass, once conferred, cannot be retracted 3. Position of Mazoon in the hierarchy of Dawat 4. Ibrahim establishing that Dai-Mazoon are the spiritual father and mother of the children of Dawat, from Tanbeeh ul Ghafeleen.

Bayan by Syedna Muhammad b. Taher establishing that Dai-Mazoon as being represented by two of the four words of the kalemat ul-shahada Bayan by Syedna Muhammad b. Mazoon-e-Dawat Dr. Ibn ul Khuwaisara was one such individual. Did not Moula explicitly state that he had unequivocally passed judgement and if anyone opposed it, it was tantamount to questioning his own authority?

As has been the case, he capitalises on the ignorance of those who are not fluent in Arabic and manipulates the meaning of a hadeeth to suit his needs. He says:. This is a gross mistranslation of the hadeeth. The hadeeth is as follows:. What Khuzaima is actually doing is implying that all those who testified to Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA were false witnesses whose testimonies were either incorrect or unverified. Furthermore, he implies that.

Questioning the Authority of not just the Dai. Khuzaima also refers to the example of the man who was falsely accused of stealing. Rasulullah ordered the severing of his hands at which point it was revealed by divine intervention to Rasulullah that the man was innocent and through a miracle, Rasulullah rejoined his hands.

Khuzaima has failed to understand the subtext of this case. Instead, he is implying that R asulullah was prone to errors in judgement. Imam Qaim was presented with a case of an accused individual who was falsely testified against. Consequently Imam ordered the execution. Imam Mansoor his mansoos knew that the individual was innocent but was not able to stop the execution in time. He informed Imam Qaim accordingly and Imam Qaim instructed Imam Mansur to convey to the witness that he had, on good authority, proof that he had falsely testified.

Imam Qaim was furious at this response and said his second response was even more unforgiveable than the first. Syedna al Qadi al Noman clarifies further that the reason for the execution of the accused was not that a false testimony was made. In fact, there was another reason which Imam Qaim was privy to which justified his execution. He has rejected the testimony of those who were trusted witnesses as recognised by Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin.

He has gone further and implied Moula was falsely led to pass a faulty judgement. Let us suppose for arguments sake, that someone did present a false testimony to Moula, does it not behove Khuzaima to understand that Imam ul Zaman would have done Ilhaam accordingly and let Moula know? Imam ul Zaman would have immediately let Moula know of the truth of the events. Khuzaima is still convinced till this very day, that Moula was wrong in accepting the testimony of trusted witnesses.

The events of Africa in H are true. No matter how hard he strives to blanket the truth, light will always shine through the darkness. He does not believe Aqa Burhanuddin RA is infallible yet he wants others to believe that he, KQ himself is kal-maasum.

Khuzaima seems to have forgotten that while being in Namaz one must keep faced to Qiblah and should not indulge in looking around or elsewhere.